Legal Opinion
Curth v. Faraday, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided September 30, 1975No. Civ. A. 5-70333PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JOINER, District Judge.
This is an action by an employee for damages under section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act. The plaintiff alleges that he was wrongfully discharged from his job as a “hand trucker” on January 30, 1973. Defendants, the employer and local union, move independently,'but on substantially the same grounds, to dismiss the complaint and for summary judgment. The motions are presented on the basis of the pleadings, affidavits, exhibits, and plaintiff’s deposition. 1 Three grounds are set forth: (1) that plaintiff failed to exhaust the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Ford Motor Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Rosa M. Figueroa De Arroyo v. Sindicato De Trabajadores Packinghouse, Afl-Cio, and Puerto Rico Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
- William Ruzicka, and Cross-Appellee v. General Motors Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, and Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- Allen L. Griffin v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, UawCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Goolsby v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
- Dutrisac v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1981
- Kaiser v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1992
- Sargent v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen, & Helpers of America, Food & Beverage Drivers, WarehousemenDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1989
- Goolsby v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.