Legal Opinion
Frias v. Commissioner of Social Security
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided December 13, 2016No. 15-cv-5020 (SJF)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
FEUERSTEIN, District Judge:
Pro se Plaintiff Rodolfo Frias (“Plaintiff’ or “Frias”) commenced this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3), seeking judicial review of the final determination of Defendant Commissioner of Social Security (“Defendant” or “Commissioner”) denying Plaintiffs Au*127gust 9, 2012 application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) benefits. See Docket Entry (“DE”) [1]. Presently before the Court is Defendant’s unopposed motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c). DE [13]. For the reasons set forth…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Ysabel Rosa v. John S. Callahan, Acting Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Coughlin v. O'MalleyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2024
- Tavera v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2025
- Taylor v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2024