Legal Opinion

Goldschmiedt v. Goldschmiedt

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 6, 1970No. [No. 341, September Term, 1969.]PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Appellant, Ursula N. Goldschmiedt, sued her husband, Harry R. Goldschmiedt, the appellee, for custody of the minor child of the parties and child support. He countered with a cross-bill for divorce a vinculo matrimonii on the grounds of adultery. The chancellor granted the husband the divorce, awarded custody to the husband and denied the wife’s motion for costs and counsel fees on appeal. We shall affirm the action of the chancellor.

The courts have long recognized that it is a rare situation when proof of the actual act of adultery is produced. In Breault v. Breault, 250 Md. 173, 242 A. 2d…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Dougherty v. DoughertyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  2. Swoyer v. SwoyerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1929
  3. Shanbarker v. DaltonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  4. Krebs v. KrebsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  5. Fanning v. WarfieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ross v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  2. Davis v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  3. Sullivan v. AuslaenderCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  4. Mullinix v. MullinixCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  5. Howard v. GishCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API