Legal Opinion
City of Portland v. Environmental Protection Agency
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided November 6, 2007No. 06-1068PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge TATEL.
TATEL, Circuit Judge:
In this case Portland and New York City challenge an Environmental Protection Agency rule regulating microbial contaminants in drinking water. The rule requires the two cities to take several steps to eliminate the parasite Cryptospo-ridium from their drinking water. The cities challenge the rule on many grounds, arguing that EPA improperly conducted a required cost-benefit analysis, provided inadequate notice and opportunity for public comment, ignored significant comments on the draft rule, failed to use the best…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- PDK Laboratories Inc. v. United States Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- American Textile Manufacturers Institute, Inc. v. DonovanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Home Box Office, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Professional Baseball, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Arkansas Dairy Cooperative Ass'n v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Lake Carriers' Ass'n v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- National Telephone Cooperative Ass'n v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- American Trucking Associations v. Federal Motor Carrier Safety AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- National Ass'n of Home Builders v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.