Legal Opinion

People v. Moe

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 22, 1931No. Docket No. 2093PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant Moe appeals from a conviction under a charge of murdering Carlisle Lord and from an order of the trial court denying his motion for a new trial.

[1] One of the points made by appellant is that the evidence in the cause was insufficient to justify the verdict against him.

Before we proceed to a discussion of that question, let us recite portions of the evidence which do not bear directly upon it but which are introductory to it. A Mr. Lassen and his wife, and Carlisle Lord, the father of Mrs. Lassen, lived together in a little house in the town of Walteria, which place is nearly…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  2. People v. BrittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  3. People v. FloresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  4. People v. RodwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  5. People v. StriderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. People v. SameniegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. People v. SilvaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. People v. JaggersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. People v. MeyersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API