People v. Moe
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Defendant Moe appeals from a conviction under a charge of murdering Carlisle Lord and from an order of the trial court denying his motion for a new trial.
[1] One of the points made by appellant is that the evidence in the cause was insufficient to justify the verdict against him.
Before we proceed to a discussion of that question, let us recite portions of the evidence which do not bear directly upon it but which are introductory to it. A Mr. Lassen and his wife, and Carlisle Lord, the father of Mrs. Lassen, lived together in a little house in the town of Walteria, which place is nearly…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- People v. BrittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- People v. FloresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- People v. RodwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- People v. StriderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- People v. SameniegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- People v. SilvaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- People v. JaggersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- People v. MeyersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.