People v. Jaggers
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
TAPPAAN, J., pro tem.
Appellant and one Weirick were accused in an information filed by the district attorney with having committed the crime of robbery. Both defendants named in the information pleaded “not guilty”, but at the time the cause was called for trial defendant Weirick withdrew his plea of “not guilty” and entered a plea of “guilty”. Appellant was then placed upon trial alone, a trial was had, and a verdict of robbery in the first degree was duly returned by the jury.
Appellant's first specification of error is that the evidence was insufficient to justify the verdict of the jury.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. KauffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- People v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- People v. CreeksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- People v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- People v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- People v. CarlsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- People v. SilvaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- People v. SpinosaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Sandoval v. Southern California Enterprises Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1950
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.