Legal Opinion

People v. Jaggers

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 15, 1932No. Docket No. 2162PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAPPAAN, J., pro tem.

Appellant and one Weirick were accused in an information filed by the district attorney with having committed the crime of robbery. Both defendants named in the information pleaded “not guilty”, but at the time the cause was called for trial defendant Weirick withdrew his plea of “not guilty” and entered a plea of “guilty”. Appellant was then placed upon trial alone, a trial was had, and a verdict of robbery in the first degree was duly returned by the jury.

Appellant's first specification of error is that the evidence was insufficient to justify the verdict of the jury.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. KauffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. People v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. People v. CreeksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. People v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. People v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. People v. CarlsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. People v. SilvaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. People v. SpinosaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Sandoval v. Southern California Enterprises Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1950

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API