Legal Opinion

Aquino v. Baldwin

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 30, 2000No. CV95-0639; CA A100284PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, P. J.

The state petitions for reconsideration of our decision in Aquino v. Baldwin, 163 Or App 452, 991 P2d 41 (1999), arguing that we made a factual error that, in turn, led us ultimately to reach an erroneous conclusion that petitioner had received inadequate assistance of trial counsel. We grant reconsideration to clarify and correct our statement of the facts but adhere to our legal conclusion that petitioner received constitutionally inadequate assistance of trial counsel.

The underlying criminal prosecution concerned the rape of two young women by four perpetrators. One of the victims…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Aquino v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Abbott v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. Bogle v. ArmenakisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  3. Thompson v. BellequeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. State v. PradoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  5. Grimes v. PalmateerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API