Legal Opinion

African Methodist Episcopal Church, Inc. v. Smith

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 19, 2016No. 1141100, 1141101, 1150055, and 1150156PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STUART, Justice.

Kurtrina Smith and Rickey Levins separately initiated actions against the African Methodist Episcopal Church, Inc. (“the AME Church”); James L. Davis, bishop and presiding officer of the AME Church’s Ninth Episcopal District (Davis and the AME Church are hereinafter referred to collectively as “the Ninth District”);1 and *819Lincoln National Life Insurance Company (“Lincoln National”) (hereinafter collectively referred to as “the defendants”), after Lincoln National denied their respective claims for benefits under certificates of insurance issued pursuant to a group…

2Cases cited70 opinions

  1. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. SCI Ala. Funeral Servs., LLC v. HintonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2018
  2. Ladarren Earl Rivers v. AT&T Mobility LLC, et al.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2026
  3. West Alabama Bank and Trust v. Perry County Board of Education (Appeal from Perry Circuit Court: CV-24-900004).Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API