Legal Opinion
Shah v. Smith
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided February 20, 2009No. C-080298PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hendon, Presiding Judge.
{¶ 1} This case presents the question whether 8025 Beech Ave. is encumbered with a three-foot easement that allows the owners of 8027 Beech Ave. the right of ingress and egress over a single driveway that runs between the two properties.
{¶ 2} Rajnikant and Vina Shah owned adjoining properties at 8025 and 8027 Beech Ave. The property line between 8025 and 8027 Beech Ave. runs down the middle of a shared driveway. 8027 Beech Ave. has a back door, as well as a rear, detached garage. The Shahs never lived at either address and used both as rental properties.
{¶ 3} The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance v. Guman Bros. FarmOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Endersby v. SchneppeOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
- McGovern Builders, Inc. v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
- Stephen Business Enterprises v. Lamar Outdoor Adv., C-070373 (3-7-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Suermondt v. LoweOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. State of OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Canter v. GarvinOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- Acorn Dev., L.L.C. v. Sanson Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Acorn Development, L.L.C. v. Sanson Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Southwestern Obstetrics & Gynecology, Inc. v. Mehta, M.D.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.