Legal Opinion

United States v. State of Ohio

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 21, 2015No. 13-4362PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED OPINION

WHITE, Circuit Judge.

The United States appeals from the district court’s denial of its motion for summary judgment and grant of the State of Ohio’s and Buckingham Coal Company’s (“Buckingham”) motions for summary judgment in this action challenging Ohio’s right to lease Buckingham the right to mine coal lying beneath land acquired for a flood-control project. We REVERSE.

I

In 1948, the United States and Ohio entered into á cost-sharing agreement to construct and maintain the Tom Jenkins Dam and Burr Oak Reservoir (“Project”) to control flooding in southeast Ohio’s Hocking River…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Empire Healthchoice Assurance, Inc. v. McVeighSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Westfield Insurance v. GalatisOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Kelly v. Medical Life InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Sunoco, Inc. (R & M) v. Toledo Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. John Moody v. Mich. Gaming Control Bd.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  2. Albert Hansen v. Ryan AperCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  3. Aragonite Capital Markets, LLC v. Dark Horse Media, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2023
  4. Diamond Transportation Logistics Inc v. The Kroger CoDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2023
  5. Eischen v. Adaptation Financial Ventures, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2024

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API