Weinstock-Nichols Co. v. Courtney
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Wm. D. Dehy, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
A technical question only is presented on this appeal taken from a judgment entered against the defendants. It is presented on the judgment-roll.
Appellants contend that the superior judge of Inyo County, who sat at the trial in Los Angeles County, was without power to settle and sign the findings in the county of Ills residence. The right of a judge of one county to make up and sign findings in a county other than that in which the trial has been had has long been settled by the decisions of our supreme court. (Comstock Q. M. Co. v. Superior Court, 57 Cal. 625; Walter v. Merced Academy…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. RuefCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Walter v. Merced Academy Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Estudillo v. SEC. Loan & Tr. Co. of S. Cal.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Comstock Quicksilver Mining Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by3 opinions
- Murphy v. SheftelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Howard v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Hughes v. Nashua Mfg. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968