Howard v. Howard
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
After the trial of a divorce action plaintiff was granted an interlocutory decree of divorce and plaintiff’s attorney was directed by the trial judge to prepare proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law. This was done and the original and a copy thereof were handed to the clerk of the court. Copies were also mailed to defendant’s attorneys.
Thereafter, defendant’s attorneys prepared proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, copies of which were mailed to plaintiff’s attorneys. The trial judge set May 23, 1952, as the date for the hearing on the findings of fact and conclusions…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- C. O. Bashaw Co. v. Wood & Stevens, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1925
- Murphy v. SheftelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- City of Los Angeles v. BlondeauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Burns v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Pereira v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. LindenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Spindler Realty Corp. v. MonningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Young v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Howard v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957