Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Wilson

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided October 15, 1976No. ACM 22030PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

ORSER, Judge:

Tried by a general court-martial, with members, the accused stands convicted, despite his pleas, of six specifications of wrongful possession, sale and use of heroin, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934. The approved sentence is a dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, confinement at hard labor for three years, and reduction to the grade of airman basic.

Though numerous errors have been assigned by the accused and appellate defense counsel, we consider it necessary to address only a few. All others are…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. DonohewUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  3. United States v. CourtneyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  4. United States v. MoselyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  5. Arnold v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. MooreU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1980
  2. United States v. HendersonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1976
  3. United States v. SandersU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
  4. United States v. JohnsonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1976
  5. United States v. SparksU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API