Legal Opinion

United States v. Sparks

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided May 23, 1988No. ACM 26433PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*677DECISION

BLOMMERS, Judge:

The appellant stands convicted of use of cocaine after the discovery of its metabolite, benzoylecgonine, during urinalysis testing. The sentence, as adjudged by members and approved by the convening authority, is a bad conduct discharge and reduction to airman basic (E-l). The appellant now contends that his detailed trial defense counsel was statutorily barred from acting as his counsel.

The Charge and its Specification were preferred against the appellant on 21 April 1987. Through completion of the Article 82 Investigation the appellant was represented by Captain W.,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. FisherUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  2. United States v. HarperUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  3. United States v. FordUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  4. United States v. DavisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  5. United States v. StrangstalienUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. SparksUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  2. United States v. StarksU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API