Lorna Kreines v. United States of America, and Jack McMenimen Wayne Yamashita
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GOODWIN, Circuit Judge:
Lorna Kreines appeals from an order denying her post-judgment motion for attorney’s fees and costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (1988). The district court ruled that because Kreines prevailed in her civil action against two federal officers in their individual capacities, she is not entitled to attorney’s fees under the EAJA. Kreines v. United States, 812 F.Supp. 164 (N.D.Ca.1992). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and affirm.
In January 1987, Kreines filed a complaint against the United States and various state,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Ratzlaf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Zehner v. TriggDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1997
- Lucas v. WhiteDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1999
- Gregory Baldwin v. City of Estherville, IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
- Gasplus, L.L.C. v. United States Department of InteriorDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- In Re: Nanette SiskCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.