Legal Opinion
City of Aurora v. City of Bay Village
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided June 4, 1971No. 30777PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtManos, P. J.
In 1966, in response to the growing revenue needs of the city of Cleveland, Ordinance No. 2393-66 was enacted. This ordinance established a threefold master plan for (1) a Cleveland income tax, (2) tax reciprocity for other municipalities in Cuyahoga and contiguous counties which passed similar legislation, and (3) a method by which to administer the collection and disbursement of these taxes.
Under its provisions, an income tax of 1% of gross salary was imposed upon all who resided or were employed in Cleveland. Recognizing that the income tax legislation would create an insurmountable…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Blosser v. EnderlinOhio Supreme Court · 1925
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Hartzell Bros.Ohio Supreme Court · 1924
- McBride v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1947
- Great Lakes Towing Co. v. Bethlehem Transp. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
- Benes v. Hickox Bldg. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jamie Securities Co. v. The Limited, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Cleveland Trust Co. v. SnyderOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
- Aree III Corp. v. BergerOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
- G/GM Real Estate Corp. v. Svisse Chalet Motor Lodge of Ohio, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990
- Jamie Securities Co. v. The Limited, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989