Legal Opinion
United States v. Julius
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 11, 2010No. Docket 08-4267-crPublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POOLER, Circuit Judge:
The government appeals from the ruling and order, dated August 7, 2008, of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Chatigny, J.), which granted defendant-appellee Thomas Julius’s motion to suppress evidence in the form of a firearm seized in the course of his arrest for violation of his parole. See United States v. Julius, 577 F.Supp.2d 588 (D.Conn.2008). The district court earlier denied Julius’s motion to suppress ammunition seized during the search that occurred at a later point in time. That ruling is not at issue in this interlocutory…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Griffin v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Herring v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Samson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- United States v. PaynerSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- United States v. BershchanskyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- United States v. GaniasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- United States v. RosaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- United States v. BarnerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- United States v. BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.