Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Tann

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 30, 1982No. 1771PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROWLEY, Judge:

The Commonwealth appeals from an order denying its Petition to Extend the time for trial under Pa.R.Crim.P. 1100 and discharging appellee.

A complaint was filed against appellee on October 15, 1980. Therefore, the period for trial under Rule 1100 was due to expire on April 13,1981, one hundred and eighty days later. Trial was scheduled for April 7, 1981. The night before the trial, the prosecutor called the home of the sixteen-year-old victim, who had been subpoenaed, to remind him of his obligation to be present in court the next day. At that time, the prosecutor was advised by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SharpSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Commonwealth v. SinorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Commonwealth v. LongSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ColonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. BullingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Commonwealth v. LeatherburySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Commonwealth v. BurkeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API