Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Sharp

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 22, 1981No. 2633PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

The Commonwealth contends that the lower court erred in concluding that the time for commencing trial was improperly extended pursuant to Pa.R.Crim.P. 1100(c). We agree and, accordingly, reverse the order of the lower court.

On October 23, 1978, the Commonwealth filed a criminal complaint charging appellee with various offenses arising from a robbery committed earlier that day. Thus, pursuant to Pa.R.Crim.P. 1100(a)(2), appellee’s trial should have commenced on or before April 23, 1979. Appellee’s trial was scheduled for March 19, 1979. On that date, however, appellee’s newly…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. EhredtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Commonwealth v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Commonwealth v. SinorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ColonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. BullingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Commonwealth v. WrotenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Commonwealth v. HarrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API