Legal Opinion
Munhall v. Inland Wetlands Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 28, 1992No. 14277; 14279PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCovello, J.
These appeals raise two principal issues: (1) whether the individual members of an administrative agency can be aggrieved so as to entitle them to pursue a statutory appeal from an agency decision in which they cast dissenting votes; and (2) whether the individual members of an administrative agency have standing to pursue a declaratory judgment action against the agency with respect to an agency decision in which they cast dissenting votes. We conclude that such individual members are neither aggrieved so as to entitle them to appeal from an agency action nor do they have standing to sue the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mystic Marinelife Aquarium, Inc. v. GillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Nader v. AltermattSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Unisys Corp. v. Department of LaborSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- City of New Haven v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Rommell v. WalshSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- New England Rehabilitation Hospital of Hartford, Inc. v. Commission on Hospitals & Health CareSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- United Cable Television Services Corp. v. Department of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Gladysz v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Andross v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Zoning Board of Appeals v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.