Legal Opinion

Bentley v. Derwinski

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided September 13, 1990No. 89-70PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRAMER, Associate Judge:

SUMMARY

This case involves an appeal by Russell L. Bentley (veteran) from a decision by the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA) which concluded that the rating actions of February 24 and April 25, 1960, were not clearly and unmistakably erroneous in failing to assign ratings of 60 percent rather than 40 percent for traumatic arteriovenous aneurysm under 38 C.F.R. § 4.104 (1989), Diagnostic Code 7113.

We conclude that, as a matter of law, there was clear and unmistakable error in not awarding a 60-percent rating on February 24, 1960 and that, as a consequence, a 40-percent…

2Cited by25 opinions

  1. Manio v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
  2. Karnas v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
  3. Thompson v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
  4. Proscelle v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992
  5. Eddy v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1996

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API