Legal Opinion
Manio v. Derwinski
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Decided February 15, 1991No. 90-86PublishedCited by 258 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANKIN, Associate Judge:
Appellant, Emilio C. Manió, has repeatedly sought disability compensation for pyorrhea and resulting tooth loss. The denial of appellant’s claim for service connection was initially upheld by the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA) in a January 27, 1988, decision. Following his submission of new evidence, appellant’s claim was reopened but the denial of service connection was again affirmed in a November 14, 1988, decision by the BVA. Subsequently, appellant submitted the medical opinion of Dr. Déla Pena as a new evidentiary basis upon which to reopen his claim. The BVA,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Czaplicki v. the Hoegh SilvercloudSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Woods v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989
- Brundage v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- Jamesbury Corp. v. Litton Industrial Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Deering v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by258 opinions
- Colvin v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
- Allday v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1995
- Russell v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992
- Masors v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992
- Espiritu v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992
253 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.