Legal Opinion

Rich v. Burdick

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1961No. 8948PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff (respondent) Idaho Board of Highway Directors, brought this action for a judgment requiring the defendants (appellants) to remove certain obstructions, erected and maintained by them, from U.S. Highway 30, in the village of Bennington, in Bear Lake county. The obstructions consist of two gasoline pumps, a concrete island, with canopy and signs. From a judgment requiring such removal, the de fendants, Burdick and wife, brought this appeal.

This controversy arose when the state highway department, in preparation for improving the highway through Bennington,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bayhouse v. UrquidesIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  2. State Ex Rel. Rich v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Boise City v. SinselIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Hostetter v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Yellow Cab Taxi Service v. City of Twin FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1948

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. West v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Schneider v. HoweIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Pointner v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Pullin v. City of KimberlyIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Bare v. Department of HighwaysIdaho Supreme Court · 1965

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API