Legal Opinion

Pullin v. City of Kimberly

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1979No. 12802PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONALDSON, Justice:

The plaintiffs-appellants Wiley Pullin and Shirley Pullin, husband and wife, initiated an action on August 5, 1976 in which they sought to enjoin the defendant-respondent, City of Kimberly, from trespassing or exercising any dominion over a 25 foot strip of real property situated parallel to and immediately adjacent to the eastern boundary of the plaintiffs-appellants’ premises within the municipal boundaries of the City of Kimberly. Appellants additionally sought a decree to quiet title of this strip of real property in themselves.

After answering appellants’ complaint,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Vincent Di Vito v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
  2. Dawson v. MeadIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Lisher v. KrasseltIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Sines v. BlaserIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Kahle v. Amtorg Trading Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Eby v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Dawson v. CHEYOVICH FAMILY TRUSTIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Johnston v. PascoeIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Pincock v. Pocatello Gold & Copper Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Dustin v. BeckstrandIdaho Supreme Court · 1982

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API