Legal Opinion

State v. Hulum

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 20, 2002No. CR 01-1271PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ray Thornton, Justice.

This is a State's appeal from the conviction of appellee, Eugene Hulum, of manslaughter for the death of his nineteen-month-old son, Marquis Hulum. Appellee does not appeal from that conviction. The State acknowledges that the jury’s manslaughter verdict operates as an acquittal for double-jeopardy purposes on the charges of capital murder and first-degree murder on which the jury was also instructed, making retrial of appellee on those charges impermissible. See e.g., Price v. Georgia, 398 U.S. 323, 329 (1970). Based on these double-jeopardy principles, the State does…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Price v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Rainey v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  4. State v. StephensonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  5. State v. BanksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bradford v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  2. State v. Hagan-SherwinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  3. State v. AudSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  4. Mouton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
  5. Bradford v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API