Legal Opinion

State v. Banks

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 6, 1995No. CR 95-666PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

The state brings this appeal pursuant to A.R.Cr.P. 36.10(b-c), contending that it has inspected the trial record and is satisfied that the state has suffered prejudicial error and that the correct and uniform administration of the criminal law requires this court’s review. Rule 36.10 is jurisdictional and mandatory, and as this court has said on numerous occasions, the state has no right to appeal beyond that conferred by the constitution or rules of criminal procedure. State v. Edwards, 310 Ark. 516, 838 S.W.2d 356 (1992). As a matter of practice, the court has only taken…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  5. State v. McMullenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Mullinax v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. State v. StephensonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. State v. McCormackSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  4. State v. GuthrieSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  5. State v. DawsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API