Legal Opinion

Corah v. Corah

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 17, 1956No. 36,612PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank T. Gallagher, Justice.

Appeal by plaintiff from those parts of a judgment dismissing an action with prejudice in favor of defendant; providing that the plaintiff take nothing from the defendant; and decreeing that plaintiff should not receive her costs and disbursements as against defendant. The appeal arises out of an equitable action instituted by Nellie Corah in October 1951, for an award from her former husband, William J. Corah, of alimony and a division of property. The said defendant obtained an absolute divorce by default from the plaintiff in December 1933 in the District Court…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Loth v. LothSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  2. Elsen v. State Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  3. State Ex Rel. Peterson v. BentleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  4. Brockman v. BrockmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  5. Cantieny v. BozeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Marriage of Gully v. GullySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  2. Hebert v. City of Fifty LakesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  3. CAROGA REALTY COMPANY v. TapperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  4. Inland Products Corp. v. Donovan Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  5. Dempsey v. MeighenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API