Legal Opinion

Burgher v. Wisconsin Lottery

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided September 16, 2024No. 2:24-cv-01141Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN AMY BURGHER, Plaintiff, Case No. 24-CV-1141-JPS v. WISCONSIN LOTTERY, ORDER Defendant. 1. INTRODUCTION On September 9, 2024, Plaintiff Amy Burgher (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed this action against the Wisconsin Lottery. ECF No. 1. She also paid the filing fee. Docket notation to ECF No. 1. This Order screens Plaintiff’s complaint and dismisses it for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 2. SCREENING STANDARD “[D]istrict courts have the power to screen complaints filed by all litigants . . . regardless of fee status.” Rowe v.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API