Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Russo v. Deters
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided October 22, 1997No. 1997-0763PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 80 Ohio St.3d 152.] [THE STATE EX REL.] RUSSO, APPELLANT, v. DETERS, PROS. ATTY., APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Russo v. Deters,
1997-Ohio-351.] Civil procedure—Motion for relief from judgment—Court of appeals does not abuse its discretion in overruling a Civ.R. 60(B) motion when movant fails to establish a meritorious claim. (No. 97-763—Submitted August 26, 1997—Decided October 22, 1997.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County, No. C-961098. __________________ {¶ 1} Appellant, Robert Russo, was charged with robbing…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
- Grava v. Parkman TownshipOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Rose Chevrolet, Inc. v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Grava v. Parkman Twp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995
- State ex rel. Fuqua v. AlexanderOhio Supreme Court · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Schaub, 22419 (9-19-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Burgess v. Safe Auto, Unpublished Decision (12-23-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
- Landspan Corporation v. Curtis, 91664 (12-4-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Early v. State, 91230 (11-6-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Jma North Coast Property Mgt. v. Sutera, 88224 (6-21-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.