Legal Opinion
Oliver-Electrical Manufacturing Co. v. I. O. Teigen Construction Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided May 26, 1960No. 4-57-Civ-7PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DEVITT, Chief Judge.
Both parties have moved to amend the findings of fact and conclusions of law filed by the Court. The memorandum is reported at D.C.Minn.1959, 177 F.Supp. 572.
I have examined all of the contentions of both parties. I am not certain of the legal authority for my action in awarding the defendant interest as part of its damages. The Court’s conclusions of law allowed the plaintiff interest on its claim from December 1, 1956 to the date of entry of judgment, February 17, 1960. The' defendant was allowed interest on its counterclaim from September 24,1956 *769to February 17, 1960.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Grand Trunk Western R. Co. v. HW Nelson Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
- Robberson Steel Co. v. HarrellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
- Swanson v. AndrusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Lacey v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Grand Trunk Western R. v. H. W. Nelson Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- ZumBerge v. Northern States Power Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Clements Auto Company v. Service Bureau CorporationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1969
- Ralston Purina Company v. Parsons Feed & Farm Supply, Inc., Thurman Parsons, Inez Parsons, Glenn Parsons, and Alma Parsons, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- In Re Estate of RenczykowskiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987