Legal Opinion

Charles Beseler Co. v. O'Gorman & Young, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 4, 2006PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

I

This appeal involves interpretation of an exclusion contained in the liability portion of an employer’s Workers’ Compensation and Employers Liability Insurance Policy (Policy). The facts involved are these.

Malden A. Homar was an employee of Liberty Bureau Steel, a division of the Charles Beseler Company (collectively, Beseler). On Homar’s first day at Beseler, he was assigned to work on a large press brake machine, which bends metal into library shelves. Tragically, the machine compressed unexpectedly and amputated eight of his fingers.

Homar filed workers’ compensation and common-law claims…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Millison v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  2. Zacarias v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  3. Princeton Insurance v. ChunmuangSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  4. Laidlow v. Hariton MacH. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
  5. Travelers Indem. Co. v. PCR INC.Supreme Court of Florida · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Pizzullo v. New Jersey Manufacturers InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
  2. Estate of Myroslava Kotsovska v. Saul Liebman (073861)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
  3. Johnson v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  4. Beneficial Mutual Savings Bank v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Stancil v. ACE USASupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API