Stancil v. ACE USA
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the CourtHoens, Justice
In this matter, we are asked to create a common law cause of action that would permit an injured employee, who is separately entitled to receive workers’ compensation benefits, to sue his employer’s compensation carrier directly for pain and suffering when it results from the carrier’s delay in payment for medical treatment, prescriptions, or related services. We decline this invitation to create a new cause of action for three essential reasons.
First, the workers’ compensation system has been carefully constructed by our Legislature in a manner that serves to protect the rights of injured…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Millison v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Laidlow v. Hariton MacH. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- Crippen v. Central Jersey Concrete Pipe Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
- Mull v. Zeta Consumer ProductsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
- Van Dunk v. Reckson Associates Realty Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Estate of Myroslava Kotsovska v. Saul Liebman (073861)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
- Caraballo v. City of Jersey City Police Dep'tSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2019
- State of New Jersey v. Gary TwiggsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2016
- LOUIS MAGNIFICO VS. NATHANIEL JAMES (L-4279-16, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
- MARGARET ALLEN VS. MB MUTUAL HOLDING COMPANY (L-0410-18, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.