Legal Opinion
Fylken v. City of Minot
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided January 20, 1936No. File No. 6378PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Nuessle, J,
This action was brought to enjoin the defendant the city of Minot from enforcing certain provisions of its ordinance regulating the sale of beer. The case was tried to the court without a jury. Judgment was ordered and entered against the defendant, which thereupon perfected this appeal.
The pertinent facts herein may be stated as follows: Section 8 of the Initiated Measure authorizing the manufacture, sale, and distribution of beer, approved September 22, 1933, see page 495, et seq., Sess. L'aws 1935, as amended by chapter 97, § 3, Sess. Laws 1935, provides:
“There is hereby…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Purity Extract & Tonic Co. v. LynchSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Lang v. City of CavalierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
- Schmidt v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- State v. Fargo Bottling Works Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ace Tire Co., Inc. v. Municipal Officers of WatervilleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
- State Ex Rel. Agnew v. SchneiderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Egbert v. City of DunseithNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
- City of Prichard v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- State v. HougeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.