City of Prichard v. Richardson
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
STAKELY, Justice.
This is a suit brought on the common counts to recover taxes in the amount of $1058.98, which the plaintiff, Cammie Richardson (appellee), claims t'o have paid under protest to the defendant, the City of Prichard, a municipal corporation (appellant). This amount was paid under protest, as appellant claims, as license taxes for the operation of a drive-in filling station or stations. Cammie Richardson operated the filling station or stations in the community of Toulminville, which was within the police jurisdiction of the City of Prichard, but outside its city limits. 'The…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Van Hook v. City of SelmaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
- Mayor of New York v. Second Avenue RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- Phœnix Carpet Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
- City of Madera v. BlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- State Ex Rel. Brooks v. GullattSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hawkins v. City of PrichardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- Chadwick v. Town of HammondvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
- City of Prichard v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- City of Montgomery v. Montgomery City Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1949
- L. W. Richardson & Co. v. Town of HamiltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.