Legal Opinion
In Re Buckeye Countrymark, Inc.
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided November 16, 1998No. Bankruptcy 97-34911Published
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER ON PERMISSIVE ABSTENTION CONCERNING HEDGE-TO-ARRIVE CONTRACTS
WILLIAM A. CLARK, Chief Judge.
This court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334, and the standing General Order of Reference entered in this District on July 30, 1984. The Joint Motion for a declaratory judgment is a non-core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(c)(1).
This matter came before the court for hearing on the Joint Motion of John Paul Rieser, Chapter 7 Trustee, and Fifth Third Bank for Declaratory Judgment Finding That Buckeye Countrymark, Inc.’s Hedge-to-Arrive…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Nathanson v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Ricci v. Chicago Mercantile ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Order of Railway Conductors of America v. PitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Smith v. Hoboken Railroad, Warehouse & Steamship Connecting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Chicago Mercantile Exchange v. DeaktorSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.