Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Finn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 10, 2003PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal *510from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 12, 2002, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

In August 2001, claimant was discharged from his employment as a quality control clerk after he failed to call the employer to explain a three-day absence. In January 2002, claimant was rehired. Claimant was discharged in February 2002 for again failing to call the employer with regard to a three-day absence. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board denied…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of FrancisNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. In re the Claim of PluckhanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. In re the Claim of PluckhanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of AnumahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. In re the Claim of BuyukcekmeceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. In re the Claim of FinnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. Matter of McCarthy (Grunblatt Psychology & Counseling Offs., P.C.--Commissioner of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  5. In re the Claim of GrahamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API