Legal Opinion

Rose v. Rose

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1884No. 9504PublishedCited by 18 opinions

From the Wayne Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtNiblack, J.

— The complaint in this case was filed on the 27th day of April, 1881,.and, as afterwards amended, charged that the appellant, Thomas Rose, was, on the 24th day of September, 1867, married to the appellee, Helen M. Rose; that at the time of their marriage the parties resided, and have1 ever since continued to reside, in the city of Richmond in this State; that at the time of the marriage the appellee was by occupation a milliner, but was without property or means of her own; that in the spring of 1871, it was agreed between them that the appellant should furnish the appellee with means…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fischli v. FischliIndiana Supreme Court · 1825
  2. Muckenburg v. HollerIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Williams v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Moon v. BaumIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Moore v. CottinghamIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. AndersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Nicholson v. NicholsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Walker v. WalkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Faught v. FaughtIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Evans v. EvansIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API