Fisher v. McCarty
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Mahaska District Court.—D. W. Hamilton, Judge. Action at law, to recover a sum of money claimed to belong to plaintiff and to be in tbe hands of the defendant. The cause was-tried to the court without the intervention of a jury, and judgment was rendered for the defendant. Plaintiff appeals.'—
1Opinion of the CourtFaville, J.
1. Appeal and error: briefs: assignment in amended brief. This appeal is prosecuted with little regard to the rules of this court. It is scarcely possible that our observations respecting Rule 53 in Reynolds & Heitsman v. Henry, 193 Iowa 164, have been unnoticed by counsel for appellant. In State v. Wallack, 193 Iowa 941, we said:
“Under the rules of practice in this court, it is the duty of counsel, in preparing of brief and argument, to prepare what is designated a ‘brief,’ following the errors relied upon for a reversal, and such brief should contain, under a separate heading of each error…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Wine v. JonesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
- Reynolds v. HenrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- Dodge v. Grain Shippers' Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- Stilwell v. StilwellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Richardson v. City of CentervilleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Lorimer v. Hutchinson Ice Cream Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1933
- W. T. Rawleigh Medical Co. v. BaneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
- Blomgren v. City of OttumwaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
- Bodholdt v. TownsendSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
- Eilers v. FrielingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.