Legal Opinion

Bodholdt v. Townsend

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 12, 1929No. 39665PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWagner, J.

It is the contention of the appellee that "the errors relied upon for a reversal," as set out in appellants' brief, are insufficient, and present nothing for our determination. The appellants, in their brief, under the heading quoted as aforesaid, allege:

"1. The trial court committed error in overruling defendants' motion for directed verdiet, as shown abstract of record, page 8, line 22 et seq.
"2. The trial court committed error in overruling the defendants'. motion for directed verdict, made at the close of all of the testimony, as shown abstract of record, page 9, line 28 et seq.
"3. The…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of MottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  2. Reynolds v. HenrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  3. State v. LamberttiSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  4. Dodge v. Grain Shippers' Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  5. Town of Waukon v. StrouseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Duncan v. RhombergSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  2. Lorimer v. Hutchinson Ice Cream Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  3. Oestereich v. LeslieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  4. Blomgren v. City of OttumwaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  5. Kapphahn v. Martin Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API