Legal Opinion
Blomgren v. City of Ottumwa
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided November 21, 1929No. 39939PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWagner, J.
The appellant in its brief, under the heading ‘1 Errors Relied Upon For Reversal, ’ ’ states:
"The trial court erred in overruling defendant’s motion for a directed verdict, which motion was submitted at the close of plaintiff’s testimony and at the close of all the evidence, and in overruling defendant’s motion for new trial upon the grounds stated in Paragraphs 9 and 10 of said motion for a new trial.”
Grounds 9 and 10 of the motion for a new trial are as follows:
“9. Because the court erred in overruling the defendant’s motion to direct a verdict filed at the close of the plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- In Re Estate of MottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
- Reynolds v. HenrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- Dodge v. Grain Shippers' Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- Blakely v. CabelkaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
- Richardson v. City of CentervilleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Lorimer v. Hutchinson Ice Cream Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1933
- Robertson v. CarlgrenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
- State v. CampbellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
- Morrow v. DowningSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
- Baker v. General American Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.