Legal Opinion

Gray v. Morley

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1999No. 111205, Calendar No. 6PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AFTER REMAND

Brickley, J.

The question presented is whether the exclusive remedy provision of the Worker’s Disability Compensation Act, MCL 418.131(1); MSA 17.237(131)(1), precludes plaintiff from maintaining a cause of action against defendant employer arising out of injuries suffered by plaintiff on the job. We find that plaintiff has not presented the requisite proof that defendant specifically intended to injure plaintiff, and affirm the trial court’s grant of summary disposition in favor of defendant.

i

Plaintiff Scott Gray began working for defendant Kevin Charles Morley, a sole proprietor…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Beauchamp v. Dow Chemical Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Travis v. Dreis & Krump Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Herman v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. David J McQueer v. Perfect Fence CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Davis Ex Rel. Davis v. CMS Continental Natural Gas, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  4. Fries v. Mavrick Metal Stamping, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Alford v. Catalytica Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API