Legal Opinion

Presinzano v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 2, 1984No. 83-5176PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*107OPINION OF THE COURT

SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.

I

Angelo M. Presinzano, a laboratory technician at'Hoffman-LaRoche, Inc. (LaRoche) since 1970, developed a chronic sensitivity to chemicals used in some of the company’s operations as a result of a workplace accident in 1976. Unable to work in operations of the plant requiring exposure to chemical fumes and dusts, Presinzano was transferred to other company operations but was unable to secure a permanent position. On June 19, 1978, he was notified that his employment would be terminated because “no permanent position was available” that he could fill…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. MilhollinSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Dowling v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  2. United States v. SanttiniCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  3. Crown Heights Jewish Community Council, Inc. v. Fischer (In Re Fischer)District Court, E.D. New York · 1996
  4. Butler County Memorial Hospital v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  5. Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge No. 5 v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API