State Ex Rel. Winn v. City of San Antonio
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Per curiam
This is an action in the nature of quo warranto brought under the provisions of Article 6253 et seq., Vernon’s Ann.Tex. Stats., by the State of Texas acting upon the relation of Murray Winn, Jr., and others, claiming to be the duly elected and qualified officials of the Town of Coker Estates, purportedly organized under Title 28, Chapter 11, Articles 1133 et seq., Vernon’s Ann.Tex.Stats. The State, represented by the Criminal District Attorney of Bexar County, contended that certain annexation ordinances and proceedings of the City of San Antonio were invalid and that the City was wrongfully…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- State v. City of North Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
- Norris v. City of WacoTexas Supreme Court · 1882
- City of Houston v. State Ex Rel West University PlaceTexas Supreme Court · 1943
- City of Wichita Falls v. Bowen, TrusteeTexas Supreme Court · 1944
- City of Corpus Christi v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Gonzales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- State Ex Rel. Swan v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1955
- City of Houston v. Harris County Eastex Oaks Water & Sewer DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Forbes v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
- City of Bridge City v. State Ex Rel. City of Port Arthur, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.