Legal Opinion

Bluitt v. Pearson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 29, 1927No. 508PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarcus, J.

This suit was instituted by appellees, some 24 in number, as heirs of Mattie Dancy, deceased, against appellants to recover an undivided one-sixth interest in 40 acres of land, including the mineral rights, and in addition they asked for judgment for certain sums of money which they claimed appellants were due them as heirs of said Mattie Dancy. The cause was tried to a jury, submitted on special issues and ie- sulted in a judgment being entered in favor of appellees in line with their petition. It appears that Mattie and Eelix Dancy, two negroes, owned a 40-acre tract of land in the heart of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Richardson v. VaughanTexas Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Buchner v. WaitCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  3. Johnson v. Union Nat. Bank of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Lopez v. CalzadoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Moore v. BlackwellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  2. Black v. BoyerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  3. Texas Acceptance Corp. v. StricklandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  4. Fowler v. RodenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  5. Moore v. BlackwellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API