Legal Opinion
In Re Diehr
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 22, 1935No. 26200PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
This appeal involves the judgment of the district court of Oklahoma county in an agreed controversy filed in said court by Oscar N. Diehr and certain officials of Oklahoma county as authorized by sections 403 to 405, inclusive, O. S. 1931.
Osear N. Diehr will be hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, and the county officials as defendants.
The proceedings were instituted for the purpose of determining the constitutionality of chapter 72, S. L. 1927, now sections 12339 to 12344, inclusive, O. S. 1931. From the judgment of the trial court declaring the act in all respects constitutional, the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re Gross Production Tax of Wolverine Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- In Re Assessment of First Nat. Bank of ChickashaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- In Re Oklahoma Nat. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Exchange Oil Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- In Re Assessment of Chickasha Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Liddell v. HeavnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- Continental Oil Co. v. Oklahoma State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Boeing Company v. OmdahlNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
- Love v. SilverthornSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Save Ad Valorem Funding for Students v. Oklahoma Department of Environmental QualityCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.