United States v. Campbell
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
VARO, Judge:
Contrary to his pleas, appellant was convicted by a military judge sitting as a general court-martial of rape, consensual sodomy, and assault in violation of Articles 120,125, and 128, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 920, 925, and 928 (1982) [hereinafter UCMJ]. His approved sentence provides for a dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement for two years.
The appellant asserts that the military judge erred by denying his motion at trial to dismiss the sodomy charge for lack of speedy trial.1 He also asserts that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. SchilfUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- United States v. HendersonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. Bonano-TorresUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
- United States v. WilliamsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. RuffinNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997
- United States v. RuffinNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997