Jackson v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
JUDGE COHN.
Robert Jackson (Claimant) appeals from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that affirmed the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) denying the Petition to Review Utilization Review (UR) Determination filed by Peter Schatzberg, D.C. (Provider). We affirm.
The relevant facts found by the WCJ are as follows. Claimant sustained a work-related low back injury on May 4, 1998, while he was in the employ of Boeing (Employer). Beginning on February 3, 1999, Claimant began chiropractic treatment with Provider. On November 13, 2000, the WCJ issued…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Bethenergy Mines, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Lehigh County Vo-Tech School v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Topps Chewing Gum v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Kraemer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Womack v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Howrie v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Gary v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Arvilla Oilfield Services, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- J. Maher, DC v. City of Philadelphia (WCAB)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.