Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 2, 2003PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

JUDGE COHN.

Robert Jackson (Claimant) appeals from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that affirmed the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) denying the Petition to Review Utilization Review (UR) Determination filed by Peter Schatzberg, D.C. (Provider). We affirm.

The relevant facts found by the WCJ are as follows. Claimant sustained a work-related low back injury on May 4, 1998, while he was in the employ of Boeing (Employer). Beginning on February 3, 1999, Claimant began chiropractic treatment with Provider. On November 13, 2000, the WCJ issued…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Bethenergy Mines, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Lehigh County Vo-Tech School v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Topps Chewing Gum v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Kraemer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Womack v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Howrie v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Gary v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Arvilla Oilfield Services, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. J. Maher, DC v. City of Philadelphia (WCAB)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API