Commonwealth v. Mortimer
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCordy, J.
Pursuant to SJ.C. Rule 3:10, § 1 (g), as amended, 416 Mass. 1306 (1993), a judge in the Superior Court found that the defendant, Thomas J. Mortimer, IV, was indigent but able to contribute $40,000 to his defense against indictments charging him with the murders of his wife, mother-in-law, and two children. In setting the amount of the defendant’s required contribution, the judge considered various assets that the defendant had reported to the probation department, including bank accounts, a college fund, and an individual retirement account (IRA). She also voiced “concerns as to the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Egelhoff v. Egelhoff Ex Rel. BreinerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Fuller v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Rousey v. JacowaySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Slocum v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan (In Re Kaplan)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Commonwealth v. GalazkaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2013