Legal Opinion

United States v. Holcomb

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 24, 2011No. 11-1558, 11-1559, 11-1586, 11-1758PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

A member of this court called for a vote on the question whether these four appeals should be heard en banc on the court’s own initiative. A majority of the active judges did not vote in favor of rehearing en banc, and the proposal therefore fails. Petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc will not be accepted; this decision is the court’s final judgment. Three members of the court have written opinions explaining their votes.

EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge, with whom FLAUM, KANNE, SYKES, and TINDER, Circuit Judges, join.

These four appeals were filed by the United States with the Solicitor…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Dorsey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Weingarten v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
  3. United States v. Sylvan AbneyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
  4. United States v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. TicklesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API