Legal Opinion

United States v. Sylvan Abney

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 5, 2016No. 14-3074PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge ROGERS.

Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge BROWN.

*1082ROGERS, Circuit Judge:

In Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), the Supreme Court identified the two-prong objective test for determining whether a defendant’s constitutional right to the effective assistance of counsel has been violated. Today that question arises in the context of a sentencing for possession of 68 grams of crack cocaine that occurred five days after Congress passed the Fair Sentencing Act (“FSA”), when Presidential approval was imminent…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Missouri v. FryeSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. Yarborough v. GentrySupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Dorsey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. United States v. Aumbrey WinsteadCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  2. United States v. Queen NwoyeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
  3. United States v. Michael PalmerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  4. United States v. Carlos AguiarCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  5. Eugene Downs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API